<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Mark Reckless for Rochester and Strood</title>
	<atom:link href="http://markreckless.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://markreckless.com</link>
	<description>Conservative Parliamentary Candidate for Rochester and Strood</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 12:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Press Release re Rochester Castle by Jeremy Nichols</title>
		<link>http://markreckless.com/2010/03/03/press-release-re-rochester-castle/#comment-112</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Nichols</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 12:54:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markreckless.com/?p=886#comment-112</guid>
		<description>Read this in the Messenger this morning. Any timescale on when the wall be repaired as it looks a bloody eyesore. Doesn&#039;t send a good message about Rochester what with this and shamefully pulling down Aveling and Porter building on the opposite bank.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this in the Messenger this morning. Any timescale on when the wall be repaired as it looks a bloody eyesore. Doesn&#8217;t send a good message about Rochester what with this and shamefully pulling down Aveling and Porter building on the opposite bank.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Supporting Our High Street by P Torville</title>
		<link>http://markreckless.com/2010/02/13/supporting-our-high-street/#comment-101</link>
		<dc:creator>P Torville</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 14:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markreckless.com/?p=815#comment-101</guid>
		<description>Excellent local initiative. Do you mind if we borrow this for our local PPC&#039;s campaign?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent local initiative. Do you mind if we borrow this for our local PPC&#8217;s campaign?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on David Cameron In Medway by Nancee Nightengale</title>
		<link>http://markreckless.com/2010/01/25/david-cameron-in-medway/#comment-89</link>
		<dc:creator>Nancee Nightengale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 13:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markreckless.com/?p=740#comment-89</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this! Very interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this! Very interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Save The Great British Pub by Andrew L</title>
		<link>http://markreckless.com/2009/09/14/save-the-great-british-pub-2/#comment-86</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:12:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markreckless.wordpress.com/2009/09/14/save-the-great-british-pub-2#comment-86</guid>
		<description>UKIP are on the money with their campaign and I see no harm in Conservatives supporting the cause either. Let&#039;s face it, the widespread closures of pubs is characteristic of a gradual decline in the very culture and fabric of British life. It seems like changes are on the cards following David Cameron&#039;s speech in Medway last week where he was very clear that discounting alcohol below cost by supermarkets should be banned and there is compelling evidence that cheap alcohol has contributed to &#039;broken Britain&#039; and violent crime. Read more here to see how serious the problem has become : http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/crime-victims/reducing-crime/alcohol-related-crime/.  What is really too late is that the current government has only recently started to look into a problem citizens have had to endure for many years.

Regarding policy, my proposal would be to take it one stage further and apply a tax on beer and alchopops/premixed drinks sold from supermarkets (but not wine or spirits) and reduce the duty and tax for ALL alcohol sold in pubs. Let&#039;s face it, if supermarkets can afford to discount it below cost, they can afford to deal with the dilemma of either paying the tax on behalf of their customers or passing it straight on to them. 

There is a community benefit : pubs were historically a key component of our communities and our societal structure and also a refuge from the mother in law for some of us! I see nothing wrong with re-building our communities by helping pubs be successful again. 
For an economic benefit, perhaps we can also stimulate our once envied brewing industry too. Imagine having a choice of locals again (many people do not) that served a variety of local brews and how that could help rural and urban communities.......we might even see hops growing in Kent again too!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UKIP are on the money with their campaign and I see no harm in Conservatives supporting the cause either. Let&#8217;s face it, the widespread closures of pubs is characteristic of a gradual decline in the very culture and fabric of British life. It seems like changes are on the cards following David Cameron&#8217;s speech in Medway last week where he was very clear that discounting alcohol below cost by supermarkets should be banned and there is compelling evidence that cheap alcohol has contributed to &#8216;broken Britain&#8217; and violent crime. Read more here to see how serious the problem has become : <a href="http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/crime-victims/reducing-crime/alcohol-related-crime/" rel="nofollow">http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/crime-victims/reducing-crime/alcohol-related-crime/</a>.  What is really too late is that the current government has only recently started to look into a problem citizens have had to endure for many years.</p>
<p>Regarding policy, my proposal would be to take it one stage further and apply a tax on beer and alchopops/premixed drinks sold from supermarkets (but not wine or spirits) and reduce the duty and tax for ALL alcohol sold in pubs. Let&#8217;s face it, if supermarkets can afford to discount it below cost, they can afford to deal with the dilemma of either paying the tax on behalf of their customers or passing it straight on to them. </p>
<p>There is a community benefit : pubs were historically a key component of our communities and our societal structure and also a refuge from the mother in law for some of us! I see nothing wrong with re-building our communities by helping pubs be successful again.<br />
For an economic benefit, perhaps we can also stimulate our once envied brewing industry too. Imagine having a choice of locals again (many people do not) that served a variety of local brews and how that could help rural and urban communities&#8230;&#8230;.we might even see hops growing in Kent again too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on David Cameron In Medway by Andrew L</title>
		<link>http://markreckless.com/2010/01/25/david-cameron-in-medway/#comment-85</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 20:10:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markreckless.com/?p=740#comment-85</guid>
		<description>I went along to hear what David Cameron had to say and was delighted to see in the flesh a man with real values and beliefs and the aptitude and grace to communicate with a very mixed audience. 

The venue of the Sunlight Centre was clearly evidence of David highlighting that he is prepared to look at the issues ordinary and disadvantaged people face as well as the greater national &#039;big picture&#039;. 

His family oriented stance and response to challenging questions by a reporter on violent crime (especially youth crime) highlighted the committment to work for future generations of adults even though they might not carry a vote now - this is leadership for our country rather than just a party.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I went along to hear what David Cameron had to say and was delighted to see in the flesh a man with real values and beliefs and the aptitude and grace to communicate with a very mixed audience. </p>
<p>The venue of the Sunlight Centre was clearly evidence of David highlighting that he is prepared to look at the issues ordinary and disadvantaged people face as well as the greater national &#8216;big picture&#8217;. </p>
<p>His family oriented stance and response to challenging questions by a reporter on violent crime (especially youth crime) highlighted the committment to work for future generations of adults even though they might not carry a vote now &#8211; this is leadership for our country rather than just a party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on David Cameron In Medway by Gerald C.</title>
		<link>http://markreckless.com/2010/01/25/david-cameron-in-medway/#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerald C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:56:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markreckless.com/?p=740#comment-84</guid>
		<description>Hi Paul

I think this visit was arranged by G&amp;R association who kept it very &#039;hush hush&#039; which was their prerogative. I wonder if there may have been security reason for doing so? Not Mark&#039;s fault though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Paul</p>
<p>I think this visit was arranged by G&amp;R association who kept it very &#8216;hush hush&#8217; which was their prerogative. I wonder if there may have been security reason for doing so? Not Mark&#8217;s fault though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on David Cameron In Medway by Paul</title>
		<link>http://markreckless.com/2010/01/25/david-cameron-in-medway/#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 15:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markreckless.com/?p=740#comment-83</guid>
		<description>What a pity that his visit was not promoted. I&#039;m sure the hoi polloi would have liked a glimpse of him. What a missed opportunity

&lt;em&gt;Imported from Blogger&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a pity that his visit was not promoted. I&#8217;m sure the hoi polloi would have liked a glimpse of him. What a missed opportunity</p>
<p><em>Imported from Blogger</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scholarships For Children Of Deceased Military Personnel by Daniel Jordan</title>
		<link>http://markreckless.com/2010/01/12/scholarships-for-children-of-deceased-military-personnel/#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Jordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 22:34:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markreckless.com/?p=684#comment-71</guid>
		<description>If you canbelieve it. The Lib Dems are opposing this policy. Says a lot about the Libdems

http://www.houseoftwits.co.uk/lib-dem/hypocrisy-of-university-places-for-children-of-fallen-soldiers.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you canbelieve it. The Lib Dems are opposing this policy. Says a lot about the Libdems</p>
<p><a href="http://www.houseoftwits.co.uk/lib-dem/hypocrisy-of-university-places-for-children-of-fallen-soldiers.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.houseoftwits.co.uk/lib-dem/hypocrisy-of-university-places-for-children-of-fallen-soldiers.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scholarships For Children Of Deceased Military Personnel by George Watney</title>
		<link>http://markreckless.com/2010/01/12/scholarships-for-children-of-deceased-military-personnel/#comment-70</link>
		<dc:creator>George Watney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 21:16:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markreckless.com/?p=684#comment-70</guid>
		<description>Excellent idea!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent idea!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sir Hugh Lays Down The (Wrong) Law by Gordon the Fence Post Tortoise</title>
		<link>http://markreckless.com/2010/01/06/sir-hugh-lays-down-the-wrong-law/#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>Gordon the Fence Post Tortoise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 18:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markreckless.com/?p=590#comment-67</guid>
		<description>As an inhabitant of the county in question not far from Wootton Bassett I see Hugh Orde&#039;s interference as high handed and frankly worrying.

It is my sincere hope that a new Westminster administration will terminate all contracts nationwide with ACPO, whose policies, governance and influence are at best opaque and at worst - well - I don&#039;t know - and that&#039;s the point = secretive direction of of our police forces by a non accountable private body - is that acceptable?

As for Anjem and his pals - well - perhaps trimming their benefits might cramp their style - but the Guardianista PC brigade would have a hissy fit wouldn&#039;t they?

Wootton Bassett is being set up as a set piece confrontation by scumbuckets with equally deranged worldviews to the Islamoloons and deeply unpleasant motives want to use this town as a hobby horse to leverage their visibility and promote rotten agendas.

Why is it that I suspect Mr. Orde might be amonst those folk?

I&#039;d like to be proved wrong.

&lt;em&gt;Copied from Blogger&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an inhabitant of the county in question not far from Wootton Bassett I see Hugh Orde&#8217;s interference as high handed and frankly worrying.</p>
<p>It is my sincere hope that a new Westminster administration will terminate all contracts nationwide with ACPO, whose policies, governance and influence are at best opaque and at worst &#8211; well &#8211; I don&#8217;t know &#8211; and that&#8217;s the point = secretive direction of of our police forces by a non accountable private body &#8211; is that acceptable?</p>
<p>As for Anjem and his pals &#8211; well &#8211; perhaps trimming their benefits might cramp their style &#8211; but the Guardianista PC brigade would have a hissy fit wouldn&#8217;t they?</p>
<p>Wootton Bassett is being set up as a set piece confrontation by scumbuckets with equally deranged worldviews to the Islamoloons and deeply unpleasant motives want to use this town as a hobby horse to leverage their visibility and promote rotten agendas.</p>
<p>Why is it that I suspect Mr. Orde might be amonst those folk?</p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to be proved wrong.</p>
<p><em>Copied from Blogger</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
